Can't control my mutt

zzflop at zzflop at
Sat Feb 13 08:25:26 PST 2010

On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 07:58:07AM -0700, Scott wrote:
> Sorry to hear that your mutt has a bad case of indigestion. (Hey, even
> mutt's developers couldn't refrain from the corny jokes, as you know
> from reading the man page....)
> I can't be of much help to you, as I never subscribe via digest. I did
> find this snippet on a mail-server FAQ:
> > 6.21 My Mutt users cannot thread their digest messages
> >  The digest by default removed non-essential headers like
> > ?In-Reply-To:? from messages. Modern MUAs, like Mutt can split out
> > messages from a digest and then thread them based on such headers. To
> > include these and all other headers in the digest messages, use the
> > ?v? or ?n? format as described on the ezmlm-get(1) man page.
> > Normally, the threading done by ezmlm is sufficient and the default
> > format preferred to reduce message and digest size, often by 25% or
> > more.
> Check to see if those headers have indeed been removed. If so, I guess
> you could complain to the list maintainer. Or perhaps write an awk
> script or similar to re-insert the relevant ones. If you were using
> procmail, you could feed digests to the script on a list-by-list
> basis. Just thinking out loud; sounds like a half-vast project...
> Good luck!
> Scott Swanson
> PS: Tell me about links -g. I used to use zgv, but I can't seem to get
> it working on newer systems.
> -- 
> FAQ:
> Unsubscribe: See the above information page

I switched from digest mode to single mailings last night, 
and I think this may work better with my setup.

This is a reply to a single mail;hopefully it will end up in 
the right place.

I use links2 from Twibright labs.You can run it in the 
console with fb drivers or either X. It has a text mode
like lynx and a graphical mode if enabled.I have only used
it with vesafb, so I can't say how it works with other 
drivers.If you already have X installed there are better
alternatives for a lightweight browser. Dillo is one that
I have used.

The blfs book has a section on installation. If you are used
to the bells and whistles of a heavyweight browser, it will
probably be disappointing, but if you just "need to see 
pictures" it works fine.

Thanks for the feedback and humor.

Mike H.

More information about the blfs-support mailing list