LFS is at 6.5 BLFS is at 6.3 Why?

rhubarbpie at poetworld.net rhubarbpie at poetworld.net
Tue Nov 24 16:28:02 PST 2009


Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> rhubarbpie at poetworld.net wrote:
>
>   
>> I understand why the version BLFS is often behind LFS.  However, I do 
>> think the "one or two months" BLFS statement should be changed as it 
>> hurts credibility.  
>>     
>
> OK, done.
>
>    -- Bruce
>   

I just checked the site.  That's much better.  Thanks.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-support/attachments/20091124/cb74cabd/attachment.html>


More information about the blfs-support mailing list