LFS is at 6.5 BLFS is at 6.3 Why?
nicolas.francois at free.fr
Tue Nov 24 12:03:18 PST 2009
Le Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:23:03 -0500,
stosss <stosss at gmail.com> a écrit :
> Why does LFS stay so far ahead of BLFS? What is the point of building
> the newest LFS if the BLFS files are older and probably won't work or
> would be replacing newer versions of apps with older versions?
> There is a note on the BLFS that says in one or two months a new BLFS
> will be released. There is no date as to when that was put there or a
> target date for release. What is the target date for that one or two
> Use SVN if you are using LFS 6.4 what about LFS 6.5?
> It looks like the smart thing to do to avoid problems would be to
> build LFS 6.4 and then BLFS SVN/6.4 which is the reason for my
> orginial question in the subject.
I think one thing is not in the book : the answer to the question "why
is this package not in the book/why is this version so old/why doesn't
the book evolve any faster...".
Come on, guys, what do you think you are dealing with ? This is an
entirely free, cooperative work. Nothing advances if noone provides
work for it to move on.
So the correct answer to those questions should be : "move your ass,
you bl...y bas...rd !!!".
Nicolas FRANCOIS | /\
http://nicolas.francois.free.fr | |__|
We are the Micro$oft. _\_V
Resistance is futile.
You will be assimilated. darthvader penguin
More information about the blfs-support