fcron & run-parts
andyrbarnes at hotmail.com
Sat Mar 14 05:23:21 PDT 2009
> I would _think_ that cron jobs would still be desired in run level 2,
> and bow out gracefully on failure due to missing network, but I'm
> honestly not sure what the specs say on it. If cron _is_ expected in
> RL2, then run-parts must be in /sbin, not /usr/sbin.
> -- DJ Lucas
I see your point and I did wonder if /usr/bin was the best place.
Perhaps /bin would be better. run-parts is not really a system admin type program and I could see it being useful for ordinary users.
Free photo editing software from Windows Live . Try it now!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the blfs-support