Window manager without x server: follow INX path?
d.kuntadi at gmail.com
Mon Oct 27 20:25:06 PDT 2008
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Chris Staub <chris at beaker67.com> wrote:
> Maybe I'm just clueless, but can you explain specifically what it is you
> are proposing, and how this is any different from, say, building a
> standard LFS system and a few select packages from BLFS?
I am suggesting a complete desktop package without X. May be just try
INX livecd to get a clearer idea. But what I mean is more than just
INX, but really a desktop package without X.
More information about the blfs-support