(no subject)

Archaic archaic at linuxfromscratch.org
Fri Mar 31 15:19:26 PST 2006


On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 10:47:23PM -0600, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> 
> It simply isn't that hard to determine what "required patch" means.

It is simply a matter of perspective. Technically, the patch isn't a
gcc-3 patch, but rather a C standard compliance patch. I also agree the
patch should be renamed to reflect its new purpose (i.e. fix compile
errors with gcc-4) if for no other reason that mention of gcc3 will
cause some confusion and support questions. The book has had errors in
patch names before and this could easily be thought to be one of them by
many.


-- 
Archaic

Want control, education, and security from your operating system?
Hardened Linux From Scratch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs




More information about the blfs-support mailing list