(no subject)

Dan Nicholson dbn.lists at gmail.com
Tue Mar 28 20:16:51 PST 2006

On 3/28/06, Randy McMurchy <randy at linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:
> "Required patch: ..."
> I'm not sure what there is we can do to make it more clear that it
> is a required patch. The name of the patch should be irrelevant. I
> suppose the description part of the patch header could be updated,
> but that, to me, is secondary to the book saying that it is a
> "required patch".

This was brought up a while back.  The patch name needs to be changed
to indicate gcc4.


More information about the blfs-support mailing list