gcc-3.4.x make -k check errors
ken at kenmoffat.uklinux.net
Wed Oct 27 04:37:28 PDT 2004
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004, Lup wrote:
> I'm just trying to upgrade my existing gcc-3.3.3 to gcc-3.4.x using my LFS
> system. I wanted to have gcc-3.4.x in place before I continue updating
> any other part of BLFS. On my other already existing BLFS laptop, I'm
> running gcc-3.3.4 and it too can't upgrade to any version of gcc-3.4.x. I
> always follow the LFS and BLFS book, and install in either /opt/ or /usr/
> when instructed. However, it just won't update to any gcc-3.4.x version.
> Don't know if any of this extra info helps, just wanted to clarify what I
> was attempting to do.
I've been playing with kernels recently and I don't think I've built
gcc-3.4.x on an LFS-5.1 base, but I'm sure lots of people have. I've
certainly used a (ppc) debian system to build binutils-220.127.116.11.8 and
gcc-3.3.4 in /usr/local, and used those to build a 2.15.9x binutils and
gcc-3.4.2 in /opt/newtools. I just repeat the first TWO steps of a new
lfs, but with a different prefix and without the static linking.
To emphasise what I said earlier, building a newer version of gcc over
the top of the existing one (e.g. both in /usr) might cause grief one
day, and you really need to ensure you are using an _appropriate_
version of binutils for the new version of gcc.
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
More information about the blfs-support