j2sdk and openoffice on latest unstable

Nathan Coulson conathan at gmail.com
Mon Oct 25 04:23:33 PDT 2004


On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 20:25:19 -0700 (PDT), Jeremy Utley (-J-), LFS
Staff <jeremy at linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:
> On Sun, October 24, 2004 7:52 pm, Gregory Davis said:
> > Archaic wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 10:47:43PM -0600, Nathan Coulson wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm getting failures of a different type and from a different host, but
> >> just for the record, what version of OOo are you building? You said the
> >> latest BLFS, so I'm assuming 1.1.2? If so, there is a 1.1.3 out there.
> >> If you use that, the no-pam patch has one occurence of libpam.so that
> >> needs changed to libpam.so.0 to work apply.
> >>
> >
> > The libXp failed dependency is because Xprint is no longer built in Xorg
> > (see host.def).  The binaries from OpenOffice, Mozilla, and Java are all
> > linked against it, thus they no longer load.  Also, compiling with
> > gcc-3.4.x causes stricter adherence to ISO C/C++ than the developers of
> > those projects had followed, so compilation of those projects is broken
> > (except maybe Mozilla, havn't tried in a while).
> >
> > Greg
> 
> I can say that Mozilla and it's derivatives (Firefox, Thunderbird) will
> successfully compile on a GCC 3.4.x-based system without difficulty.  I
> wouldn't have upgraded LFS to there if it hadn't, because I consider these
> programs to be almost a necessity.
> 
> -J-

ah, XPrint.  Thanks.

BTW, been playing with gcc 3.3.4.  not gcc 3.4


-- 
Nathan Coulson (conathan)
------
nathan at linuxfromscratch org
conathan at gmail com



More information about the blfs-support mailing list