LFS 5.0 - dhcpcd failing
ken at kenmoffat.uklinux.net
Sun Feb 8 12:17:10 PST 2004
On Sun, 8 Feb 2004, Albert wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
> > For 2.4 series, no need to upgrade or rebuild anything else when you
> > recompile a newer kernel. Testing new kernels would be a pig if you
> > had to rebuild your LFS every time.
> Great! Thank you, Ken. I don't like using modules anyway. Is there a
> good reason not to compile everything into the kernel except for
> limited memory?
Beyond not wasting memory with a bloated kernel, and the option to
specify parms to modules (e.g. settings for sb16 - rmmod and retry until
it works), mainly the possibility that you will have to change things.
For a desktop or server, having extra nics as modules may be helpful.
I seem to remember that in some situations usb-storage might have to be
removed before mounting a different device, but if true that is probably
Brighton tops UK Jedi league
More information about the blfs-support