uptime from sh-utils broken? (was: Re: uptime & w)
dagmar.wants at nospam.com
Wed Jul 30 10:12:58 PDT 2003
On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 06:47, Ulrich Fahrenberg wrote:
> Thanks, all there. Why didn't I look for /proc/uptime before I posted?
> The problem is that my uptime is the one from sh-utils-2.0, not from
> procps-3.1.8 (as it would be if I had a standard 4.1 install). The
> procps-uptime works like a snap here, but shutils-uptime does not.
> This might also shed some light on the recent lfs-dev discussion
> whether The Book should use the uptime from procps-3 or coreutils:
> Is it only me, or is the shutils/coreutils version of uptime broken?
> (And if it's only me, why?)
There are almost zero cases where it is useful to _not_ mount /proc.
The uptime command failing because you don't have proc mounted does not
make it broken.
The email address above is just as phony as it looks, and for obvious reasons.
Instant messaging contact nfo: AIM: evilDagmar Jabber: evilDagmar at jabber.org
More information about the blfs-support