Doubt regarding ATI-radeon

Ken Moffat ken at kenmoffat.uklinux.net
Tue Jul 29 06:00:59 PDT 2003


On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, layman wrote:

>
> --- Ken Moffat <ken at kenmoffat.uklinux.net> wrote:
>
> >  In the kernel, enable drm but don't bother building
> > the module for the
> > radeon, because X-4.3 needs a more recent version of
> > the interface.  X
> > will work without dri, but anything that could use
> > it (glxgears is the
> > easiest example, included in X) will will be a lot
> > slower than when it's
> > enabled.
>
> OK i do as you say,
> IN blfs-book, it is given to update the DRI
> architecture from the xfree86 to the
> kernel(lib/modules/kernel/drm...).
>
> Now is that neccessary with respect to the procedure
> above given by you ?
>
 That was what I intended to paraphrase.  Definitely believe the book is
right!

> And also by not enabling Radeon module in the kernel
> will affect the performance of it ?
>

 I meant, don't enable radeon in the kernel's drm section, you may well
still want the radeon under framebuffers (unless you don't like
framebuffers).

-- 
 Peace, love, linux






More information about the blfs-support mailing list