BLFS from host?
archaic at comcast.net
Tue Nov 12 20:51:29 PST 2002
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 09:58:34PM +0000, chris.danx wrote:
> partition while lfs is on an ext2 partition. Is that the difference?
> On my SuSE drive, the disk is 0.3% noncontiguous. On LFS it is 9.5%.
> Can you defrag linux partitions?
I don't know if concern should be had over that 9.5%, but if that is a
fresh build of LFS, something seems not right. Now, if you were building
all those libs and rebuilding things to support those new libs at the
same time as continuing to build the base LFS, then I could see it as HD
access would be pretty wild and not very sequential. Freshmeat (or
google) for defrag. It's out there, it's old, it works, it doesn't do
much good. The ext2 fs is much better that any of the FAT's and NTFS for
writing sequentially on the HD.
Government: If you refuse to pay unjust taxes, your property will be
confiscated. If you attempt to defend your property, you will be
arrested. If you resist arrest, you will be clubbed. If you defend
yourself against clubbing, you will be shot dead. These procedures are
known as the Rule of Law.
- Edward Abbey
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe blfs-support' in the subject header of the message
More information about the blfs-support