Where next?

Dagmar d'Surreal dagmar at speakeasy.net
Sun Nov 10 12:13:12 PST 2002


On Sun, 2002-11-10 at 11:53, Esteban de Echevarría wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Nov 2002 09:46:01 -0600
> Archaic <archaic at comcast.net> wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 10:58:29AM -0500, James Drabb wrote:
> > > Otherwise you will be always maintaining your PC over using it.
> > 
> > I find that to be one of the most enjoyable parts :) (though I must
> > say that I have a few spare boxes to play with while leaving the main
> > systems alone).
> 
> correct me if i'm wrong, but I can update all in my system excepting
> glibc, gcc and binutils, right?

There's nothing stopping you, but it would be inadvisable to proceed
further with these three packages because going any higher with two of
them requires you to more or less rebuild everything on your system,
again.

> and another question, glibc 2.3 is a development version? i have read
> that it has optimizations that make some code run faster, is that right?

No, and no.

-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe blfs-support' in the subject header of the message



More information about the blfs-support mailing list