libfam & libstdc++

Tim Holterhus lfs at holterhus.com
Tue Nov 5 22:59:02 PST 2002


On Tuesday 05. November 2002 21:52, Dagmar d'Surreal wrote:
> Is there any serious reason you can't just recompile FAM?  It will
> link to libstdc++.so.5 this time around, eliminating the problem... 
> This was one of those irksome reasons C++ apps would all have to be
> recompiled after moving to gcc 3.2.x from certain older versions.

That's what I'm doing right now, but there are many more apps that were 
compiled pre 3.2.x. Even X is still dependant on libstdc++.so.4 (libGLU 
just complained...)

Regards,

	-Tim
-- 
If at first you don't succeed, call it v1.0!

-- 
Unsubscribe: send email to listar at linuxfromscratch.org
and put 'unsubscribe blfs-support' in the subject header of the message



More information about the blfs-support mailing list