[blfs-dev] about pax

Bruce Dubbs bruce.dubbs at gmail.com
Thu Mar 13 11:43:32 PDT 2014


Pierre Labastie wrote:

> I have found 2 sources for pax:
> - the mirbsd package, debianised by Debian (the "orig" I put in the
> ticket). It does not build as is, because the debian "rules" (a makefile
> actually) are shipped separately, and those rules use heavily the debian
> packaging system. So we would first have to make a package and put it on
> anduin. Also, According to some internet sources, the mirbsd pax program
> does not provide the pax format (?), and so, does not pass the lsb tests.
> - the heirloom package. You have to download the full heirloom
> "toolchest" (not a big deal, it is just 1MB), then edit a config file (I
> think a couple of sed's is enough), then issue various make commands (if
> you do not want to build the whole toolchest). It seems more doable, but
> I may miss some pros and cons, so I ask on this list whether there are
> issues with the heirloom package (it does not seem to be much used by
> distros)

I've never used pax.  IMO, the only reason to have it is for LSB 
compatibility.  That would seem to rule out mirbsd, but I can't 
understand Debian not meeting LSB requirements.

As for the heirloom toolchest, can you answer some basic questions:

What packages are available besides pax?
Do they conflict with programs from other packages?

I'll ask on the LSB mailing list and see if they know.

   -- Bruce




More information about the blfs-dev mailing list