[blfs-dev] Package stats

Fernando de Oliveira famobr at yahoo.com.br
Sat Mar 8 01:35:06 PST 2014


Em 07-03-2014 17:40, Ken Moffat escreveu:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 06:22:52PM +0000, Ken Moffat wrote:
>>  It is clear that my rebuild of the docs was very different from
>> Fernando's.  At the moment I'm concentrating on rebuilding
>> everything in chroot, just in case there is any breakage from
>> accidental change in gnutls.  My first attempt at LO just timed out
>> on one of the downloads, so I guess I'm hours away from completing.
>> After that, I'll take another look.
>>
>  Got back to this.  This time, I cannot get close to the figures I
> had before for rebuilding with the docs: time is now an extra +0.1
> SBU, which I think is in line with Fernando, and space has
> *increased* by 3 MB instead of reducing slightly.
> 
>  Looking back at my history, I see that I ran 'make clean' before
> the second build (the one regenerating the docs), and I suppose that
> might account for the reduced space.  But I cannot see any reason
> why the 'make' with gtk-doc took so much time on that occaasion.
> 
>  Since Fernando was upset by my measurements, on this occasion I'll
> change them.
> 
> ĸen
> 

I am never upset with what you do. You have a very good and interesting
humour.

I only replied because you mentioned, if not, I would only notice
anything when upgrading, and doubt very much if I would ask anything.

On the positive side, it is interesting to know what happened (make
clean), so I will be careful. to never do that for this purpose. Another
good side of this is that I was doubting if the names I was using were
confusing, but it seems that we can continue doing that.

So, thanks for having had the patience to re-measure.

Sorry if I seemed upset, but I was really not.

Actually, I am in debt with you, you have always been helping me a lot.
One of the last, you solved an old problem I had with the ink levels of
my printer, introduced me to escputil, and tought me to build a custom
one in my printer server (Lubuntu, not BLFS, and you helping me). It was
a long exchange of mails, and even upstream you contacted.

-- 
[]s,
Fernando



More information about the blfs-dev mailing list