[blfs-dev] patches r2920 - trunk/icedtea

Fernando de Oliveira famobr at yahoo.com.br
Thu Jun 26 03:21:30 PDT 2014


Em 26-06-2014 04:54, Pierre Labastie escreveu:
> Le 26/06/2014 01:49, Ken Moffat a écrit :
>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 08:23:46PM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>>> Em 25-06-2014 16:46, pierre at higgs.linuxfromscratch.org escreveu:
>>>> Author: pierre
>>>> Date: Wed Jun 25 12:46:52 2014
>>>> New Revision: 2920
>>>>
>>>> Log:
>>>> Regenerate cacerts patch for icedtea
>>>>
>>>> Added:
>>>>     trunk/icedtea/icedtea-2.5.0-add_cacerts-1.patch
>>>>
>>>> Added: trunk/icedtea/icedtea-2.5.0-add_cacerts-1.patch
>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>>
>>>> --- /dev/null    00:00:00 1970    (empty, because file is newly added)
>>>> +++ trunk/icedtea/icedtea-2.5.0-add_cacerts-1.patch    Wed Jun 25
>>>> 12:46:52 2014    (r2920)
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,557 @@
>>>> +Submitted By: Fernando de Oliveira <famobr at yahoo dot com dot br>
>>> I put my name when I did a simple rediff or just put the LC_ALL=C, can't
>>> remember. Please, the guilty one, now, are you. :-)
>>>
>>>> +Date: 2013-07-13
>>>> +Initial Package Version: 2.4.1
>>>> +Update:  Modify instruction creating certificates to use LC_ALL=C
>>>> +         2013-07-20
>>>> +         Regenerate for version 2.5.0 (P. Labastie, 2014-06-25)
>>>> +Upstream Status: Not Submitted
>>>> +Origin: DJ Lucas <dj AT linuxfromscratch DOT org>, Bruce Dubbs
>>>> (mydate function)
>>>> +Description: Allows the build to generate a valid JDK cacerts file
>>>> using the
>>>> +             system installed CA certificates.
>>>> +
>>   When I update a patch, I mostly leave the original submitter and
>> add my name and whatever I changed somewhere in the text, often at
>> the end.  I had not noticed an Update: field - I like the idea, but
>> certainly each change ought to have someone credited : although svn
>> and git use 'blame' I don't think of it as "who broke it", but "who
>> tried to fix it", so I am reluctant to use "guilty", even in this
>> sense of "you touched it last, so you are 'it'". [ not sure if that
>> will be understood - in a children's game here, the one who gets
>> touched becomes "it" until he or she can touch somebody else ].
>>
>> ĸen
> In France, the game is "jouer au chat" (play "cat"), and the one who is
> touched becomes the cat (guess the others are mice) until he or she can
> touch somebody else. I like the "Updated" field too. Unless DJ or
> whoever put the patch first wants to change, I think we can keep the
> patch as is.
> Also, the first patch I committed is wrong, and the second attempt is
> better but does not do what it is supposed to do, so I am perfectly OK
> with the term "guilty".

OK, then I was the wrong one, when I changed to my name.

Please, change it back to

Submitted By: DJ Lucas <dj AT linuxfromscratch DOT org>


-- 
[]s,
Fernando


More information about the blfs-dev mailing list