[blfs-dev] Udev vs Eudev page
Fernando de Oliveira
famobr at yahoo.com.br
Sat Jun 7 08:13:36 PDT 2014
Em 07-06-2014 11:58, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu:
> Em 07-06-2014 11:48, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu:
>> Of course not.
>> Correct thing to do is reverting to the old stile page, as you first
>> suggested above.
> Forgot to write: page was unversioned for many years, with problems
> described there. There was surely a reason. I believe today it is even
> more important to keep that way, as systemd owner is doing so "strange"
> things, that issues could be even more impostant, too.
>> I did not want to update eudev (so I didn't take it earlier), exactly
>> because of this problem. If you had not taken it, I was intending to ask
>> exactly what could be done to update, as I did not want to build over
>> previous one in my system.
>> And the manpages are also a problem, as a recent post in other of our
>> lists demonstrated. We do not need to install them, exactly because
>> Bruce thought that it would not be a different version, in "extras". I
>> believe he forgot all these issues, when editing from udev to eudev (as
>> you once recalled me) to systemd to eudev again.
Pierre, sorry to disturb you again.
I'm attaching a page I just found, in the older style, that, perhaps you
could use as a guide.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the blfs-dev