[blfs-dev] Udev vs Eudev page
Fernando de Oliveira
famobr at yahoo.com.br
Sat Jun 7 07:58:22 PDT 2014
Em 07-06-2014 11:48, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu:
> Of course not.
> Correct thing to do is reverting to the old stile page, as you first
> suggested above.
Forgot to write: page was unversioned for many years, with problems
described there. There was surely a reason. I believe today it is even
more important to keep that way, as systemd owner is doing so "strange"
things, that issues could be even more impostant, too.
> I did not want to update eudev (so I didn't take it earlier), exactly
> because of this problem. If you had not taken it, I was intending to ask
> exactly what could be done to update, as I did not want to build over
> previous one in my system.
> And the manpages are also a problem, as a recent post in other of our
> lists demonstrated. We do not need to install them, exactly because
> Bruce thought that it would not be a different version, in "extras". I
> believe he forgot all these issues, when editing from udev to eudev (as
> you once recalled me) to systemd to eudev again.
More information about the blfs-dev