[blfs-dev] glibc errors in blfs packages on i686
bruce.dubbs at gmail.com
Sat Aug 31 17:16:15 PDT 2013
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 09:20:28AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> OK, I just rebuilt LFS in my sandbox with the new packages. It was
>> extremely clean. I had no FAILs at all and The only Errors were from glibc:
>> make: *** [/sources/glibc-build/posix/tst-getaddrinfo4.out] Error 1
>> make: [/sources/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 1 (ignored)
>> make: [/sources/glibc-build/conform/run-conformtest.out] Error 1
>> OTOH, I understand the concerns. I'll revert what I did in my sandbox
>> and rebuild and from that do -rc2. I will still take the advice in
>> Chapter 3:
>> "The Linux kernel is updated relatively often, many times due to
>> discoveries of security vulnerabilities. The latest available 3.10.x
>> kernel version should be used"
>> -- Bruce
> In -rc2 I had my normal fails in binutils and parts of gcc (that
> was with my usual "set CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS and sweep the static libs
> under the carpet, also build using all CPUs" variant. My glibc
> results looked like yours.
> Anyway, I've now completed my normal desktop on x86_64 with intel
> graphics. In case there is any doubt, I am standing by everything I
> tagged for 7.4 in -rc1, with the exception of two packages (elfutils
> and the ati video driver) that I only build on desktops with an ATI
> video chip. From here it is looking very good.
> Thanks for your work in identifying the i686 problem.
That was Fernando. I think him for spotting the problem.
With everyone's help, we can get out a good release. I'm especially
happy with everyone's contributions to BLFS. I think it will be a major
accomplishment if we can get out the first stable BLFS release since
More information about the blfs-dev