[blfs-dev] A patch proposal

Denis Mugnier myou72 at orange.fr
Thu Aug 8 14:11:33 PDT 2013


On 08/07/13 13:27, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Denis Mugnier wrote:
>> On 08/07/13 03:19, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> Ken Moffat wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 07:16:46PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>>>> I'm generally OK with it, but we need to come up with a strategy for the
>>>>> Perl modules.  I generally use cpan -i<Module1::Name>   for those and we
>>>>> don't want that repeated in every section.  There are 13 separate
>>>>> modules listed and it seems like it would make for 13 very short pages.
>>>>      Installing from cpan is great if what you want to do is pull in the
>>>> dependencies automatically.  I've done it myself, on occasion.  But
>>>> I think most LFS users are sufficiently anal to want to know what is
>>>> pulled in - for that, running the commands by hand is the way to go,
>>>> is it not ?
>>> There is output of exactly what is being done: dependencies, build,
>>> test, install.  All you have to do is use tee and direct to a file.
>> My proposal is just to split the xml files, not the html rendering. One
>> xml file is one module, but all modules are on
>> the same page in the book.
>> My goal is to simplify the xml, but not to change the organisation of
>> the BLFS book ;o).
>>
>> If you apply my patch, you can see that the python-modules page is the
>> same in the HTML rendering.
> OK, I see what you did.  I withdraw my objection.
>
>     -- Bruce
So  can I do the others splits ?

Denis



More information about the blfs-dev mailing list