[blfs-dev] other filesystem utilities

Qrux qrux.qed at gmail.com
Wed Feb 29 20:46:30 PST 2012

On Feb 29, 2012, at 8:38 PM, Nathan Coulson wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Bruce Dubbs <bruce.dubbs at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Andrew Benton wrote:
>>> Thanks to your message I've spent some time playing with gpt today
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GUID_Partition_Table
>>> and I now think there's a good case for putting gptfdisk into LFS.
>>> fdisk and cfdisk are installed in LFS but if you have a GUID partition
>>> table they're no use. I think gptfdisk should be in LFS.
>> What about parted which is already in BLFS?
>> Actually, I think BLFS may be good enough.  We would need parted on the
>> host system.  If we need it after we boot into LFS, it can be built via
>> BLFS.

Assuming LFS isn't the host...

>> Also, util-linux plans to add GPT support into fdisk in version 2.22.
>> That's probably six months away.
>> I'm open to gptfdisk, but would like to see more discussion.
>>   -- Bruce
> for myself, I have always liked fdisk's style to parted, which is
> probably why I went to gptfdisk all those years ago.  If I recall,
> parted has less control over the partition types then fdisk/gptfdisk
> (ex:/ I couldn't make a boot partition).  that was a year or two ago
> though...

May want to consider whether or not LFS should be a sufficient enough system to build itself (say, from a live-cd).  That would argue for a partitioner that can handle the current disk sizes.  +1 for fdisk-style interface.


More information about the blfs-dev mailing list