[blfs-dev] Xulrunner 14.0.1 needs modification for Firefox 14.0.1 [was: Xurunner ... ]

Fernando de Oliveira famobr at yahoo.com.br
Thu Aug 23 15:18:58 PDT 2012


--- Em qui, 23/8/12, Ken Moffat escreveu:

> De: Ken Moffat 
> Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] Xulrunner 14.0.1 needs modification for Firefox 14.0.1 [was: Xurunner ... ]
> Para: "BLFS Development List" 
> Data: Quinta-feira, 23 de Agosto de 2012, 14:44
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 05:48:54AM
> -0700, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> > 
> > To Ken:
> > 
> > Sorry to come back to this again.
> > 
> > 1. In the second _ln_, I believe the correct is the
> _devel_ directory:
> > 
> > s#ln -sv -f ../xulrunner-14.0.1/sdk/bin/xpcshell#ln -sv
> -f ../xulrunner-devel-14.0.1/sdk/bin/xpcshell#
> > 
> 
>  In my own script, I've added [ the FIXME is for the
> hardcoded
> directory version ]
> # FIXME and here
> ln -sv -f ../xulrunner-devel-14.0.1/sdk/bin/run-mozilla.sh
> \
>         /usr/lib/xulrunner-14.0.1
> >>$LOG 2>&1 &&
> # FIXME and here
> ln -sv -f ../xulrunner-devel-14.0.1/sdk/bin/xpcshell \
>         /usr/lib/xulrunner-14.0.1
> >>$LOG 2>&1 &&
> 
>  and I'm fairly confident that I actually ran it like that
> :)

Ok, but what I mean is that in the book it is *wrong*: the first, "ln"
*correctly* points to "xulrunner-devel-14.0.1, but the second one, with
xpcshell, is pointing to the *wrong* directory "xulrunner-14.0.1", not the
devel one.

> > 2. I noticed in the "Command Explanations":
> > 
> > "ln -sv -f
> ../xulrunner-devel-14.0.1/sdk/bin/run-mozilla.sh The
> > run-mozilla.sh and xpcshell files have been moved in
> this version, but
> > the code which installs firefox (when linked to
> xulrunner) was not
> > updated. These symlinks allow firefox to install."
> > 
> > Shouldn't it be:
> > 
> > "ln -sv -f
> ../xulrunner-devel-14.0.1/sdk/bin/run-mozilla.sh and ln -sv
> > -f ../xulrunner-devel-14.0.1/sdk/bin/xpcshell The
> run-mozilla.sh and
> > xpcshell files have been moved in this version, but the
> code which
> > installs firefox (when linked to xulrunner) was not
> updated. These
> > symlinks allow firefox to install."
> > 
> > or you think rewritting the second _ln_ in is not
> necessary in "Command
> > Explanations"?
> > 
>  I have no knowledge of what is happening in firefox, but
> somebody
> reported a different problem on support and the link leads
> me to
> believe that things will be different in 15.  And that
> is due out
> anytime - a comment elsewhere suggested that earlier this
> week was
> the likely time.

I hope so.

>  For what I think will be a temporary command explanation, I
> decided
> to merge the two paragraphs - one command, but mention both
> in the
> explanation.

That's okay with me, too.


[]s,
Fernando



More information about the blfs-dev mailing list