[blfs-dev] [lfs-book] [LFS Trac] #3162: Glibc 2.16.0 Suggestions

Randy McMurchy lfs.user at mcmurchy.com
Mon Aug 20 14:11:16 PDT 2012


LFS Trac wrote these words on 08/20/12 15:37 CST:
> Comment(by Krejzi):
> 
>  I just want to say that I personaly won't make use of /usr/libexec
>  anywhere where I make the changes untill it is official.
> 
>  I was even thinking about reverting that for Postfix and vte-0.28 untill
>  it's official.

Are those the only two packages in BLFS currently using /usr/libexec?

I realize that the issue right now is with LFS's Glibc, so just for the
record I prefer individually named directories. But I can go either way,
it is rather small. I know I will continue in my personal builds to
create individual directories for each package the needs a libexec, but
that's just me. Whatever we decide for the books is fine with me.

I cc'd BLFS-Dev for anyone wishing to discuss this issue as it pertains
to BLFS.

-- 
Randy

rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.24] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686]
16:10:01 up 3:14, 1 user, load average: 0.37, 0.21, 0.08



More information about the blfs-dev mailing list