[blfs-dev] LibreOffice 3.6.0
Fernando de Oliveira
famobr at yahoo.com.br
Tue Aug 14 08:12:59 PDT 2012
First, thank you very much for the page upgrade. Looks very good.
Em 13-08-2012 13:16, Ragnar Thomsen escreveu:
> On Friday 10 August 2012 20:41:47 Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>> The important differences with previous version 126.96.36.199 are:
>> --without-krb5 \
>> --without-gssapi &&
>> I do not have them installed. (previous versions did not need these
>> switches) and failed to build with system poppler:
> Thanks for your input, Fernando.
You're welcome! Just trying to contribute as much as I can.
> I have commited LO 3.6.0. Like you, I
> couldn't get LO to build with system Poppler. I tried both version 0.20.2 and
> 0.20.3. It's a unit test (sdext_pdfimport.test) that fails, but the error
> message isn't particularly helpful:
> Test name: N12_GLOBAL__N_18PDFITestE::testXPDFParser
> assertion failed
> - Expression: rtl::math::approxEqual(m_aHyperlinkBounds.X1,34.7 ) &&
> :approxEqual(m_aHyperlinkBounds.Y1,386.0) &&
> kBounds.X2,166.7) && rtl::math::approxEqual(m_aHyperlinkBounds.Y2,406.2)
> - Correct hyperlink bounding box
> I couldn't find any useful info on this on the web, so I decided to use the
> internal copy of Poppler for now.
I will keep watching for solutions for this, too.
> Concerning krb5 and gssapi, I don't have them either, but the "without"
> switches weren't necessary.
I have to install LO-3.6.0 in four other machines, will test again.
> I also included a patch to fix building with Boost 1.50.
Will upgrade boost (and poppler and CUPS) before installing, and use the
>> About version: it is my fault that we are using four digit version. I
>> have seen a distro that does like that, but can't remember which one.
>> The LO site has: "This release is bit-for-bit identical to the 3.6.0
>> Release Candidate 4, so you don't need to download or reinstall if you
>> have that version already." Therefore, even if it is not strictly wrong,
>> I believe, we should change (as my mind has already) to using 3.6.0
>> version, instead of 188.8.131.52, which seems to refer to a specific release
>> candidate, not version.
> I agree with you on this, so I removed the last ".4".
Thanks for that, too.
> I don't have CUPS, so I built with --disable-cups. Now, if someone with CUPS
> 1.6+ could test building LO...
I still have to get CUPS running in the Non-virtual machine. In the
others, I can test, using *buntu as host.
More information about the blfs-dev