[blfs-dev] LibreOffice 3.6.0
rthomsen6 at gmail.com
Mon Aug 13 09:16:13 PDT 2012
On Friday 10 August 2012 20:41:47 Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> The important differences with previous version 220.127.116.11 are:
> --without-krb5 \
> --without-gssapi &&
> I do not have them installed. (previous versions did not need these
> switches) and failed to build with system poppler:
Thanks for your input, Fernando. I have commited LO 3.6.0. Like you, I
couldn't get LO to build with system Poppler. I tried both version 0.20.2 and
0.20.3. It's a unit test (sdext_pdfimport.test) that fails, but the error
message isn't particularly helpful:
Test name: N12_GLOBAL__N_18PDFITestE::testXPDFParser
- Expression: rtl::math::approxEqual(m_aHyperlinkBounds.X1,34.7 ) &&
kBounds.X2,166.7) && rtl::math::approxEqual(m_aHyperlinkBounds.Y2,406.2)
- Correct hyperlink bounding box
I couldn't find any useful info on this on the web, so I decided to use the
internal copy of Poppler for now.
Concerning krb5 and gssapi, I don't have them either, but the "without"
switches weren't necessary.
I also included a patch to fix building with Boost 1.50.
>About version: it is my fault that we are using four digit version. I
>have seen a distro that does like that, but can't remember which one.
>The LO site has: "This release is bit-for-bit identical to the 3.6.0
>Release Candidate 4, so you don't need to download or reinstall if you
>have that version already." Therefore, even if it is not strictly wrong,
>I believe, we should change (as my mind has already) to using 3.6.0
>version, instead of 18.104.22.168, which seems to refer to a specific release
>candidate, not version.
I agree with you on this, so I removed the last ".4".
I don't have CUPS, so I built with --disable-cups. Now, if someone with CUPS
1.6+ could test building LO...
More information about the blfs-dev