Which is best?
randy at linuxfromscratch.org
Tue Nov 16 08:51:54 PST 2010
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 11/16/10 10:06 CST:
> I'd prefer the smaller patch and some text mentioning the warnings.
Thanks for your input, Bruce. The only concern I have with the small
patch is if someones autofoo tool chain is messed up, but that is a
fairly small issue, knowing that only autoconf needs to be run.
I like the big patch (less instructions), Bruce likes the small patch,
and DJ wants to generate a new patch. :-) I really don't care, although
Bruce's suggestion is probably best. If there are no replies (I'm sure
Ken will have an opinion), then we'll go with Bruce's suggestion.
rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.28] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 220.127.116.11 i686]
10:48:00 up 14 days, 17:42, 1 user, load average: 0.20, 0.07, 0.02
More information about the blfs-dev