cmake inclusion?

Robert Xu robxu9 at gmail.com
Tue Dec 7 17:49:43 PST 2010


On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 19:39, DJ Lucas <dj at linuxfromscratch.org> wrote:
> On 11/28/2010 12:55 PM, Robert Xu wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I finally have some working cmake scripts for Trinity, courtesy of
>> samelian on Freenode, since we do not want to use a crappy and old
>> autoconf.
>> I'm testing them right now, which brings me to another subject: Will
>> cmake be included into BLFS?
>>
>
> Okay...now I'm not so sure. The distribution is kinda sloppy and really
> is intended for developers (it's an svn checkout with varying
> directories, not really fit for distribution). It might be better to

That's not good. +1 for own tarballs.

> roll our own tarballs locally. If that is the case, I'd rather ditch the
> extra dependency (on something that most of us here do not like anyway),
> fix what is broken, and ship with proper configure scripts. With that
> said, do we have the cmake variants for tqtinterface and arts yet? If

Yes. I have them.

> so, did he get the linker fixes in for the QTLDFLAGS for the mt parts in
> tqtinterface?
>

?

-- 
later, Robert Xu



More information about the blfs-dev mailing list