"known to build with"
bruce.dubbs at gmail.com
Tue Aug 10 09:05:07 PDT 2010
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On 10 August 2010 00:29, Bruce Dubbs <bruce.dubbs at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Ken Moffat wrote:
>>> Meanwhile, I've got a question: When something builds and works
>>> with the versions currently in BLFS, both on LFS-6.6 and on recent
>>> LFS-svn, is it more useful to readers if I mark it as tested with
>>> LFS-6.6 or the LFS-svn version ? Â Anybody ?
>> I would think the LFS-svn version because that was what was actually used.
> Maybe I wasn't clear. I've got several LFS systems on each of my
> two x86_64 desktop boxes, and I'm trying to keep them available
> and patched. So, the packages have been build both on 6.6 and
> on recent svn.
I'd still go with svn.
More information about the blfs-dev