"known to build with"
zarniwhoop73 at googlemail.com
Tue Aug 10 03:36:13 PDT 2010
On 10 August 2010 00:29, Bruce Dubbs <bruce.dubbs at gmail.com> wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
>> Meanwhile, I've got a question: When something builds and works
>> with the versions currently in BLFS, both on LFS-6.6 and on recent
>> LFS-svn, is it more useful to readers if I mark it as tested with
>> LFS-6.6 or the LFS-svn version ? Anybody ?
> I would think the LFS-svn version because that was what was actually used.
> -- Bruce
Maybe I wasn't clear. I've got several LFS systems on each of my
two x86_64 desktop boxes, and I'm trying to keep them available
and patched. So, the packages have been build both on 6.6 and
on recent svn.
After tragedy, and farce, "OMG poneys!"
More information about the blfs-dev