"known to build with"
zarniwhoop73 at googlemail.com
Sat Aug 7 08:30:30 PDT 2010
On 6 August 2010 18:49, Bruce Dubbs <bruce.dubbs at gmail.com> wrote:
> The following works for me.
> -- Bruce
> --- general.ent (revision 8454)
> +++ general.ent (working copy)
> @@ -66,6 +66,11 @@
> using an LFS-6.5 platform if you use
> current package
> sources. See <xref
> for more information.</para>">
> +<!ENTITY svn_built "This package is known to build and work
> + using an LFS-SVN-">
> +<!ENTITY svn_built2 " platform.">
> <!-- End special entities about LFS compatibility -->
> <!-- Part II -->
> Index: server/databases/mysql.xml
> --- server/databases/mysql.xml (revision 8454)
> +++ server/databases/mysql.xml (working copy)
> @@ -41,6 +41,8 @@
> existing BLFS instructions. Note that versions other than the one
> in the download URLs have not been tested in a BLFS
> + <para>&svn_built;20100806&svn_built2;</para>
> <bridgehead renderas="sect3">Package Information</bridgehead>
> <itemizedlist spacing="compact">
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
OK, you've convinced me. But I suppose that the distinction
between checked and built needs to be maintained.
I've revised it r8456.
I've put the new svn entities into mailx and gamin, to prove both
work (package versions are what I'm using, and the new tags
I haven't touched mysql because I'm not sure which version of
LFS-svn you built it against.
After tragedy, and farce, "OMG poneys!"
More information about the blfs-dev