"known to build with"
zarniwhoop73 at googlemail.com
Wed Aug 4 16:21:49 PDT 2010
On 4 August 2010 23:32, Bruce Dubbs <bruce.dubbs at gmail.com> wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
>> I had assumed I would for the moment just be updating *old* things, and
>> that I could therefore note which LFS book version I had used in the commit
>> message. Wrong! First up is libpng, which at the moment says -
>> "This package is known to build and work properly using an LFS-6.5
>> When I commit it, I'll comment that for the moment. Is it worth adding new
>> entities, either for releases or for random LFS-svn versions ?
> I ran into the same thing with mysql. Perhaps we need something like:
> <!ENTITY lfssvn_checked "<para>This package is known to build and work
> properly using an LFS-SVN-"
> <!ENTITY platform "platform.</para>">
> Then, in the page,
> &lfssvn_checked;20100804 &platform;
> Change the date as appropriate.
> -- Bruce
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Mine were with LFS-6.6, my svn (+glibc-2.12.1, which causes
minor damage in LFS) is still building. Seems fair enough,
if there is no opposition I'll add these (3 variants) and the
6.6 variants when I get back to BLFS.
After tragedy, and farce, "OMG poneys!"
More information about the blfs-dev