zarniwhoop73 at googlemail.com
Tue Sep 29 12:31:47 PDT 2009
2009/9/29 William Immendorf <will.immendorf at gmail.com>:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 3:55 PM, William Immendorf
> <will.immendorf at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:38 PM, William
>> Immendorf<will.immendorf at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> New version of XZ. This is the last beta version before XZ 5.0, and
>>> Upstream says there will be no big changes between this version and
>>> 5.0. Now, I think it appears stable enough for inclusion now, don't
>>> you think? It's defently something to think about.
>> I've now noticed that Arch uses XZ too. If many distros use a package
>> that is still in beta, we should use it too. So +1 to XZ into the
> I guess no one listens to me when I have a new package. They should be.
I'm listening, and watching, but for the moment I don't
see any reason to put it in the book as a beta - for the
moment we can still get packages as .tar.gz.
After tragedy, and farce, "OMG poneys!"
More information about the blfs-dev