Additional Download section
randy at linuxfromscratch.org
Wed Sep 2 05:27:54 PDT 2009
Wayne Blaszczyk wrote these words on 09/02/09 07:08 CST:
> I notice there is an inconsistency in the use of either 'Required Patch'
> or 'Required patch' among the packages. Which form should we be using?
> or does it not matter?
I thought I had fixed all these at one time. Oh well. Here's a sample of data:
randy at rmlscsi: ~/Books/BLFS/BOOK > grep -lr "Required patch" * | grep -v \.svn-base$ | wc -l
randy at rmlscsi: ~/Books/BLFS/BOOK > grep -lr "Required Patch" * | grep -v \.svn-base$ | wc -l
There are also many places where there is descriptive text along with the
patch, and that text is lower case. So, unless someone can come up with a
reason to not to, let's use the lower case variety.
I will run a sed and change all "Required Patch", to "Required patch". I
may do a few more greps looking for plural instances and what not.
rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.26] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 184.108.40.206 i686]
07:24:00 up 14:00, 1 user, load average: 0.35, 0.18, 0.06
More information about the blfs-dev