proposal: new approach

DJ Lucas dj at
Fri Jul 24 16:59:23 PDT 2009

>> Bruce Dubbs wrote:

> I understand your point, but I was thinking of the future.  It's true that
> any
> package we update now should be against 6.5.  The absence of a line that
> says
> "Last Reviewed means that it was before 6.5.
> In the future, if we get behind again, then the Last Checked line does
> provide
> some useful information.
> For the present, it gives a quick check (without searching through 200+
> tickets)
> that a package was reviewed recently and doesn't need further review right
> now.
> I think its a reasonable approach, even if we want to remove it for a
> release.

It certainly should not be rendered in the finished book, however, a
simple comment under the first block, for each package certainly wouldn't
hurt anything.

<!-- Last checked against LFS-6.5. -->

-- DJ Lucas

This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content, and is believed to be clean.

More information about the blfs-dev mailing list