proposal: new approach
dj at linuxfromscratch.org
Fri Jul 24 16:59:23 PDT 2009
>> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I understand your point, but I was thinking of the future. It's true that
> package we update now should be against 6.5. The absence of a line that
> "Last Reviewed means that it was before 6.5.
> In the future, if we get behind again, then the Last Checked line does
> some useful information.
> For the present, it gives a quick check (without searching through 200+
> that a package was reviewed recently and doesn't need further review right
> I think its a reasonable approach, even if we want to remove it for a
It certainly should not be rendered in the finished book, however, a
simple comment under the first block, for each package certainly wouldn't
<!-- Last checked against LFS-6.5. -->
-- DJ Lucas
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content, and is believed to be clean.
More information about the blfs-dev