option vs parameter
randy at linuxfromscratch.org
Wed Aug 5 09:48:19 PDT 2009
Guy Dalziel wrote these words on 08/05/09 10:53 CST:
> In a recent discussion it was debated whether or not there is any real
> difference between option and parameter. Parameter places a slight
> emphasis on the parameter, while option does not. Docbook states
> (http://docbook.org/tdg/en/html/option.html) that "Options may or may
> not be required.", "The optional element can be used to explicitly
> identify options that are not required." Using optional places the
> parameter within brackets [--this-option]: and makes it much clearer
> that the parameter is optional.
> I propose that we start using optional for optional parameters as it is
> clearer and is in accordance with docbook.
I would probably be against this as the brackets might throw some folks
off by thinking they need them. Additionally, because we've set a standard
and been using it for many years, I suggest we maintain status quo.
rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.25] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 126.96.36.199 i686]
11:45:00 up 30 days, 13 min, 1 user, load average: 0.41, 0.28, 0.16
More information about the blfs-dev