More on cairo
randy at linuxfromscratch.org
Mon Mar 19 15:28:22 PDT 2007
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 03/19/07 17:13 CST:
> I see now that I should have used GTK+-2.10.11, so I'll update that and
> try again. Thoughts on whether I should back off to librsvg-2.14.4 ?
I would use current versions of packages. However, I wouldn't have the
needed-only-for-extended-coverage packages installed at all if you can
I'm trying to get the tests to perform the *normal* coverage tests first.
rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.28] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 220.127.116.11 i686]
17:26:00 up 10 days, 15:25, 1 user, load average: 0.10, 0.17, 0.18
More information about the blfs-dev