A minor diff to update the vim patchlevel and a question.

Ag. Hatzimanikas a.hatzim at gmail.com
Thu Mar 8 10:41:38 PST 2007


On Thu, Mar 08, at 06:44 M.Canales.es wrote:
> El Jueves, 8 de Marzo de 2007 07:31, Ag. Hatzimanikas escribió:
> 
> >
> > I will create the ticket just to update the page then,unless someone has
> > a good reason to move the vimrc contents into the vim.xml.
> 
> IMHO, configurations used only by gvim should be discussed on vim.xml but all 
> others (except maybe the ones already discussed in LFS) should go in 
> vimrc.xml.
> 
> I.e, in vimrc.xml page is created  an ampliantion of the simple vimrc 
> configuration file created in LFS, and in vim.xml page another ampliation is
> made with graphic stuff.
> 

I have no doubts that your approach -and Bruce seems to agree also- is the
most right one,but the problem I see is that we are splitting stuff all over the
place (3 pages in 2 books -3 configurations also) and it's just one package.

Another thing(s) that we can do is to move some generic option from vimrc page to 
vim.xml in LFS (and remove the vimrc page in BLFS) and then put every gui option in 
vim.xml.



More information about the blfs-dev mailing list