A minor diff to update the vim patchlevel and a question.
a.hatzim at gmail.com
Wed Mar 7 22:31:21 PST 2007
On Thu, Mar 08, at 12:22 Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ag. Hatzimanikas wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 07, at 04:02 Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> >> The reason we put the vimrc file in BLFS was that the treatment was so
> >> thin in LFS. At the time we didn't have a vim page in BLFS.
> > Oh I see,that make sense yes.
> > But I don't know if that make sense today.
> I think it does. To me, the only reason to go to the BLFS vim page is
> if you want gvim. Customization of LFS without building new packages
> goes in Chapter 3.
Oh yes,now I understand your logic.Yes I guess you are right.
I will create the ticket just to update the page then,unless someone has
a good reason to move the vimrc contents into the vim.xml.
More information about the blfs-dev