A minor diff to update the vim patchlevel and a question.
bruce.dubbs at gmail.com
Wed Mar 7 22:22:14 PST 2007
Ag. Hatzimanikas wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 07, at 04:02 Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> The reason we put the vimrc file in BLFS was that the treatment was so
>> thin in LFS. At the time we didn't have a vim page in BLFS.
> Oh I see,that make sense yes.
> But I don't know if that make sense today.
I think it does. To me, the only reason to go to the BLFS vim page is
if you want gvim. Customization of LFS without building new packages
goes in Chapter 3.
>> There is still a section in the BLFS source in inputrc, but it is commented
>> out of the book. I can't recall why that is at the moment.
> I think because there is no reason to duplicate work,since there is also a inputrc
> page in LFS book in chapter07.
Yeah. Thanks for the pointer. I remember now.
More information about the blfs-dev