A minor diff to update the vim patchlevel and a question.
a.hatzim at gmail.com
Wed Mar 7 22:19:08 PST 2007
On Wed, Mar 07, at 04:02 Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> The reason we put the vimrc file in BLFS was that the treatment was so
> thin in LFS. At the time we didn't have a vim page in BLFS.
Oh I see,that make sense yes.
But I don't know if that make sense today.
> I still think we should have the separate page here. We also have quite a
> treatment of bash configuration files.
I am not really sure if we can compare the bash page with vimrc.
Shell (bash or zsh - I am using zsh if that matters) configuration it's quite
critical in my humble opinion ,since is responsible for a sane environment of
the new created system (paths*,lang* and so on...).
Anyway I will put this matter in question in the ticket when I will find
the time to create it.
> There is still a section in the BLFS source in inputrc, but it is commented
> out of the book. I can't recall why that is at the moment.
I think because there is no reason to duplicate work,since there is also a inputrc
page in LFS book in chapter07.
I was looking in the museum for old releases because I remember there was a inputrc page.
I found out that we still had this page in 5.1 release.
I will look in the track.
Ok I found out when it happened.
More information about the blfs-dev