firefox 1.5 vs 2
dbn.lists at gmail.com
Thu Mar 1 16:15:12 PST 2007
On 3/1/07, fenna <fenna at erpel.demon.nl> wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
> > Did you apply the nss patch first or the pango patch? The nss patch
> > needs to apply first because they both play with configure*.
> Initialy I applied the patches in the order of the blfs-6.2.0 book
> (first pango, then nss) and after re-reading the instructions I did not
> find it clear that the order should be nss first and pango second.
> However after trying the modified nss patch first and than the original
> pango patch, the pango patched applied but with offsets.
Yes, that has to happen with one patch or the other because they both
affect the same file.
> > I'm getting there. I have 220.127.116.11 on my system, I'm just busy with
> > other stuff right now.
> Ok no need to invent the wheel twice, but an offer to help stands with
> the provision of not having time available on a structural basis.
If you have any particular notes, please add them to the ticket.
More information about the blfs-dev