david567 at windstream.net
Tue Aug 21 14:01:04 PDT 2007
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 8/20/07, Alexander E. Patrakov <patrakov at ums.usu.ru> wrote:
>> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>>> Is configure not shipped, or does running `make' force autoconf to
>>> run? The packaging of xfsprogs is misguided, but reading the top level
>>> Makefile might lead to a shortcut to not running autoconf.
>> Running autoconf is needed, because the Makefile uses the host's
>> libtool. Mismatches between autoconf and libtool usually lead to bad
>> results. So the real mistake is either not shipping a private copy of
>> libtool, or shipping the configure script ar all.
> Good point, and it may explain why I had a lot of linking issues with
> xfsprogs a while back.
I'll remove the sed for now. I had inconsistent success with it.
More information about the blfs-dev