dbn.lists at gmail.com
Tue Aug 21 06:11:36 PDT 2007
On 8/20/07, Alexander E. Patrakov <patrakov at ums.usu.ru> wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
> > Is configure not shipped, or does running `make' force autoconf to
> > run? The packaging of xfsprogs is misguided, but reading the top level
> > Makefile might lead to a shortcut to not running autoconf.
> Running autoconf is needed, because the Makefile uses the host's
> libtool. Mismatches between autoconf and libtool usually lead to bad
> results. So the real mistake is either not shipping a private copy of
> libtool, or shipping the configure script ar all.
Good point, and it may explain why I had a lot of linking issues with
xfsprogs a while back.
More information about the blfs-dev