Optional editline dependencies.

Ag. D. Hatzimanikas a.hatzim at gmail.com
Wed Aug 1 08:00:31 PDT 2007

On Wed, Aug 01, at 08:23 Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > I think the policy of omitting editline is valid, but if we do decide to
> > add it as optional dependencies, we should also add a caution that in
> > some cases editline conflicts with readline (which is installed in LFS).
> I would prefer if we don't list libedit as a dependency.

I believe the best thing we can do now is to comment out the
dependency, and leave it for the next release when we will have enough
time to test it in a more thoroughly way.

Your call.


More information about the blfs-dev mailing list