BLFS Project

Jim Gifford lfs at
Tue Nov 21 22:54:04 PST 2006

Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Hi all,
> I know I'm guilty as much as anyone for lack of contribution
> recently, though I *have* tried a couple of times to get
> something done, but Belgarath ended up being down, or I could
> not send mail, or whatever. I don't believe this Belgarath
> upgrade is going to happen, and the project is completely
> dying because of it.
> If there is someone with appropriate rights that can monitor
> Belgarath and restart services as they crash (and perhaps kill
> all the services that we *really* don't need), perhaps we could
> get some contribution going.
> If we can somehow get a server established that will provide
> a reliable working platform, is there anyone who is willing
> to help me get BLFS 6.2.0 (or whatever we name it) out the
> door?
> Though the Belgarath issue is the real bottleneck right now,
> and there may be no fix in sight, some suggestions as to how
> we go forward would be appreciated.
    No one has the access, the only people have access to Belg are 
Arachic and Gerard. That is one of the reasons CLFS moved away from the 
LFS server. Maybe you guys should do the same thing to prevent this from 
happening in the future.

More information about the blfs-dev mailing list