Dead Project? (I hope not)

Matthew Burgess matthew at
Sat Aug 19 10:37:57 PDT 2006

Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 03:26:01PM +0100, Matthew Burgess wrote:
>>> And switches to a newer linux-headers package.
>> I'm waiting on linux-2.6.18 so we can use a supported upstream 
>> implementation, rather than rolling our own.  That's been delayed 
>> somewhat by Linus' recent break.
>  I suspect that the 2.6.18 headers will break some packages, but
> that's only based on what we've had to do for the clfs linux-headers
> and general comments on lkml from the people doing the header
> changes.

Interesting.  Is this because of userspace apps incorrectly using kernel 
headers, or is it because the header cleanups have been too aggressive?

More information about the blfs-dev mailing list