Thoughts on Tcl (long but necessary)

Randy McMurchy randy at linuxfromscratch.org
Fri Apr 28 18:57:29 PDT 2006


Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 04/28/06 20:40 CST:

> Based on this analysis, I am in favor of eliminating the sed completely.
>  Its one of those legacy things that has developed a life of its own for
> no documented reason.

I'm not sure you understand what the tclConfig.sh program does.
It is crucial to almost every package that uses Tcl.

Unless you are certain, and 100% sure in what you are doing, you
should not remove that sed. Again, 100% certain in what you are
doing. 99.9% won't get it.

-- 
Randy

rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.28] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686]
20:54:00 up 34 days, 8:31, 1 user, load average: 0.16, 0.03, 0.01



More information about the blfs-dev mailing list