PAM (from D-Bus/HAL discussion)
randy at linuxfromscratch.org
Fri Apr 7 18:27:28 PDT 2006
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 20:20 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> For one thing, automount has been around far longer than dbus or hal.
It's not that I'm lazy and can't do the research. It's just that if
folks offer information, I'd like to hear the foundation for it.
Because Mommy said so, only goes so far.
If automount could do everything dbus/hal can (and I'm not just
talking about mounting a disk volume), why is there such complication,
energy, and changes being devoted to something that already was in
place and working?
rmlinux: [bogomips 3993.32] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.2]
[GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 188.8.131.52 i686]
20:23:30 up 18 days, 2:58, 4 users, load average: 0.24, 0.32, 0.26
More information about the blfs-dev